She implies that President George W. Bush has not and cannot stop abortions without a change in Roe vs. Wade. That is simply not true! You correctly pointed out that the president nominates judges to the Supreme Court, but, in addition to that, the president has power to:
What a difference between Bush, a staunch defender of the life of the innocent, and Sen. John Kerry who says he would "vote against any restrictions on age, consent, funding restrictions, or any law to limit access to abortion."
We all want a change to Roe vs. Wade, but even without it, Bush has made a difference in many ways and has already stopped some babies from being killed.
George T. Cooney